Added DDD comment about the Address Id as "Shadow property" as a Value Object shouldn't have an ID in the domain model.
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									6ca7f25669
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						a07a88f9c4
					
				@ -62,6 +62,10 @@ namespace Microsoft.eShopOnContainers.Services.Ordering.Infrastructure
 | 
			
		||||
        {
 | 
			
		||||
            addressConfiguration.ToTable("address", DEFAULT_SCHEMA);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
            // DDD Pattern comment: Implementing the Address Id as "Shadow property"
 | 
			
		||||
            // becuase the Address is a Value-Object (VO) and an Id (Identity) is not desired for a VO
 | 
			
		||||
            // EF Core just needs the Id so it is capable to store it in a database table
 | 
			
		||||
            // See: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/modeling/shadow-properties 
 | 
			
		||||
            addressConfiguration.Property<int>("Id")
 | 
			
		||||
                .IsRequired();
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user