Added DDD comment about the Address Id as "Shadow property" as a Value Object shouldn't have an ID in the domain model.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5cdb5afa2d
commit
dae9fdb471
@ -62,6 +62,10 @@ namespace Microsoft.eShopOnContainers.Services.Ordering.Infrastructure
|
||||
{
|
||||
addressConfiguration.ToTable("address", DEFAULT_SCHEMA);
|
||||
|
||||
// DDD Pattern comment: Implementing the Address Id as "Shadow property"
|
||||
// becuase the Address is a Value-Object (VO) and an Id (Identity) is not desired for a VO
|
||||
// EF Core just needs the Id so it is capable to store it in a database table
|
||||
// See: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/modeling/shadow-properties
|
||||
addressConfiguration.Property<int>("Id")
|
||||
.IsRequired();
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user